Genesis claims that female pain during childbirth was a result of the Fall in Eden. So it has been claimed by Bible commentators that anatomical changes in the female reproductive system changed at that time from what the female anatomy had been when first created. So is this also considered to be the Bible’s explanation for other female sexual dysfunctions including the high percentage incidence of non-orgasmic females?
Related posts:
- Repost: Female sexual dysfunction?
- Ladies, this is an honest question about sexual sensations?
- Doesn't the existence of the clitoris show that sexual pleasure doesn't always have to come with reproduction?
- Any female conditions that make sex impossible?
- What is your view on sexual dysfunction or paraphilia?
February 21st, 2010 at 10:40 pm
I’ve never run across one.
February 21st, 2010 at 10:40 pm
The deity responsible for the claimed curse is the the supernatural creator and overseer of the universe commonly addressed as God.
Theologians and philosophers have studied countless conceptions of God since the dawn of civilization, but by definition, this specific deity has a number of supernatural attributes including omniscience, omnipotence, omnipresence, perfect goodness, divine simplicity, and eternal and necessary existence.
Based on omniscience and omnipotence, He (or She) was aware of the Fall in Eden before it took place. It is my understanding that no design needed to be readdressed under these specific circumstances, just the PERCEPTION of pain increased as part of the curse.
Another factor that might be taken in consideration is the fact that ALL females were cursed with pain during childbirth, but not ALL females suffer from sexual dysfunction/anorgasmia.