<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is this considered Child Porn?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ejactulation.net/is-this-considered-child-porn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ejactulation.net/is-this-considered-child-porn/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 00:59:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Couman</title>
		<link>http://www.ejactulation.net/is-this-considered-child-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-5214</link>
		<dc:creator>Couman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ejactulation.net/is-this-considered-child-porn/#comment-5214</guid>
		<description>No it wouldn&#039;t. To qualify they would have to be doing something overtly sexual, such as displaying their genitals in a lewd way. Strictly speaking even if they were naked it wouldn&#039;t automatically be considered child porn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No it wouldn&#8217;t. To qualify they would have to be doing something overtly sexual, such as displaying their genitals in a lewd way. Strictly speaking even if they were naked it wouldn&#8217;t automatically be considered child porn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Priesthood Watch</title>
		<link>http://www.ejactulation.net/is-this-considered-child-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-5215</link>
		<dc:creator>Priesthood Watch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ejactulation.net/is-this-considered-child-porn/#comment-5215</guid>
		<description>If only half of the young women are doing these things, you have nothing to fear. See, when something reaches critical mass, it wanes rapidly afterward. 

Imagine eating Twinkies all night while watching TV. After three or four hours, you&#039;ll get sick of the same old stuff, even though the first couple tasted great. Sex is the same way. If you memorize a million breasts, waists and butts...you&#039;ll become callous to a billion more. Once callous, you won&#039;t care about mere memorizing. Only snuff films will do. After that, secret torturing and killing will give the adrenaline you crave. Then group or pack-evil can get you off. 

This explains the strangeness of our society. If the girls are just pulling up the shirt and emailing pics, that&#039;s just the innocent start of the real sludge that&#039;s ahead.

Relax.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If only half of the young women are doing these things, you have nothing to fear. See, when something reaches critical mass, it wanes rapidly afterward. </p>
<p>Imagine eating Twinkies all night while watching TV. After three or four hours, you&#8217;ll get sick of the same old stuff, even though the first couple tasted great. Sex is the same way. If you memorize a million breasts, waists and butts&#8230;you&#8217;ll become callous to a billion more. Once callous, you won&#8217;t care about mere memorizing. Only snuff films will do. After that, secret torturing and killing will give the adrenaline you crave. Then group or pack-evil can get you off. </p>
<p>This explains the strangeness of our society. If the girls are just pulling up the shirt and emailing pics, that&#8217;s just the innocent start of the real sludge that&#8217;s ahead.</p>
<p>Relax.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulywog</title>
		<link>http://www.ejactulation.net/is-this-considered-child-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-5216</link>
		<dc:creator>paulywog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ejactulation.net/is-this-considered-child-porn/#comment-5216</guid>
		<description>yes. The standards you have to day is much lower then lower. Your just brainwashed by the hippie generation who let pandoras box out in the 60`s</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes. The standards you have to day is much lower then lower. Your just brainwashed by the hippie generation who let pandoras box out in the 60`s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: addsnake</title>
		<link>http://www.ejactulation.net/is-this-considered-child-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-5217</link>
		<dc:creator>addsnake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ejactulation.net/is-this-considered-child-porn/#comment-5217</guid>
		<description>It would depend on how hard and how far the law wanted to push it, but in general no, it is not considered pornography in normal circumstance, just probably not a good idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would depend on how hard and how far the law wanted to push it, but in general no, it is not considered pornography in normal circumstance, just probably not a good idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sweet.caroline</title>
		<link>http://www.ejactulation.net/is-this-considered-child-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-5218</link>
		<dc:creator>sweet.caroline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ejactulation.net/is-this-considered-child-porn/#comment-5218</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t pass on the photos, but I doubt they are porn if there are no bare tops or bottoms. Midriff or belly button isn&#039;t porn and people wear bikini on the beach so that can&#039;t be porn.    nude would be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t pass on the photos, but I doubt they are porn if there are no bare tops or bottoms. Midriff or belly button isn&#8217;t porn and people wear bikini on the beach so that can&#8217;t be porn.    nude would be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

