Also a republican tried to add a amendment to remove protection for Pedophiles and the Democrats voted it down. Fellow Christians do you believe this filth should be protected by law??
The Hate Crime law, S.909 (and HR1913), will make 30 sexual orientations federally-protected. The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has published 30 such sexual orientations that, because of Congress’s refusal to define "sexual orientation," will be protected under this legislation. These 30 orientations are listed in the APA’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV), which is used by physicians, psychologists, social workers, nurses, and psychiatrists throughout the U.S. It is considered the dictionary of mental disorders. Those 30 sexual orientations include behaviors that are felonies or misdemeanors in most states.
Among those sexual orientations being protected by S.909 (and HR1913) are these:
Apotemnophilia – sexual arousal associated with the stump(s) of an Amputee
Asphyxophilia – sexual gratification derived from activities that involve oxygen deprivation through hanging, strangulation, or other means
Autogynephilia – the sexual arousal of a man by his own perception of himself as a woman or dressed as a woman
Bisexual – the capacity to feel erotic attraction toward, or to engage in sexual interaction with, both males and females
Coprophilia – sexual arousal associated with feces
Exhibitionism – the act of exposing one’s genitals to an unwilling observer to obtain sexual gratification
Fetishism/Sexual Fetishism – obtaining sexual excitement primarily or exclusively from an inanimate object or a particular part of the body
Frotteurism – approaching an unknown woman from the rear and pressing or rubbing the penis against her buttocks
Heterosexuality – the universal norm of sexuality with those of the opposite sex
Homosexual/Gay/Lesbian – people who form sexual relationships primarily or exclusively with members of their own gender
Gender Identity Disorder – a strong and persistent cross-gender identification, which is the desire to be, or the insistence that one is, or the other sex, "along with" persistent discomfort about one’s assigned sex or a sense of the inappropriateness in the gender role of that sex
Gerontosexuality – distinct preference for sexual relationships primarily or exclusively with an elderly partner
Incest – sex with a sibling or parent
Kleptophilia – obtaining sexual excitement from stealing
Klismaphilia – erotic pleasure derived from enemas
Necrophilia – sexual arousal and/or activity with a corpse
Partialism – A fetish in which a person is sexually attracted to a specific body part exclusive of the person
Pedophilia – Sexual activity with a prepubescent child (generally age 13 years or younger). The individual with pedophilia must be age 16 years or older and at least 5 years older than the child. For individuals in late adolescence with pedophilia, no precise age difference is specified, and clinical judgment must be used; both the sexual maturity of the child and the age difference must be taken into account; the adult may be sexually attracted to opposite sex, same sex, or prefer either
Prostitution – the act or practice of offering sexual stimulation or intercourse for money
Sexual Masochism – obtaining sexual gratification by being subjected to pain or humiliation
Sexual Sadism – the intentional infliction of pain or humiliation on another person in order to achieve sexual excitement
Telephone Scatalogia – sexual arousal associated with making or receiving obscene phone calls
Toucherism – characterized by a strong desire to touch the breast or genitals of an unknown woman without her consent; often occurs in conjunction with other paraphilia
Transgenderism – an umbrella term referring to and/or covering transvestitism, drag queen/king, and transsexualism
Transsexual – a person whose gender identity is different from his or her anatomical gender
Transvestite – a person who is sexually stimulated or gratified by wearing the clothes of the other gender
Transvestic Fetishism – intense sexually arousing fantasies, sexual urges, or behaviors involving cross-dressing
Urophilia – sexual arousal associated with urine
Voyeurism – obtaining sexual arousal by observing people without their consent when they are undressed or engaged in sexual activity
Zoophilia/Bestiality – engaging in sexual activity with animals
It’s not a law yet as the senate must approve. I only copied this from another site. From what i’m reading none of you seem to accept the fact’s that once you go down this road it is only the beginning of more moral destruction. I heard Fox news has more about this on there web site.
Related posts:
September 2nd, 2009 at 7:00 am
That’s how the so-called "sexual revolution" works. You start with tolerating the smaller, less shocking sexual perversions, like homosexuality. After that, if you are ok with homosexuality, why shouldn’t you be ok with anything else? After all, if it feels good, it must be ok, right?
September 2nd, 2009 at 7:00 am
I for one am glad that the thought-crime legislation has finally passed!
My only concern is the added expense of all the mind-reading helmets we’ll have to buy for all the judges and jurors across the country now
We’re supposed to be fiscally responsible!
September 2nd, 2009 at 7:00 am
uuuhhhh…da…da….da…ok i like uuuhhh 1…3….7…..10…(I’ve done 14 overrated)…..20..21….yeah
September 2nd, 2009 at 7:00 am
I would agree with the democrats on this one.
While you don’t need to approve of homosexuality, it would be a hate crime if you killed someone because of their sexual orientation. It would similarly be a hate crime if you killed the local sex offender because he (or she) were a pedophile.
It is not up to the public to be vigilantes. that’s what we have laws, courts and jails for.
September 2nd, 2009 at 7:00 am
Wrong Section, but i think you need some spiritual enlightenment…
have compassion and understanding, never greed to get what you want.
September 2nd, 2009 at 7:00 am
usually, democrat = sinner
September 2nd, 2009 at 7:00 am
I know it goes against your training to provide evidence for your claims, but could you supply a link to the actual text of this legislation? It’s really important to your argument, really it is.
Edit: Okay, I did your work for you. Here is the substantive meat of the text of HR1913 as it stands currently,
"‘(2) OFFENSES INVOLVING ACTUAL OR PERCEIVED RELIGION, NATIONAL ORIGIN, GENDER, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, GENDER IDENTITY, OR DISABILITY-
‘(A) IN GENERAL- Whoever, whether or not acting under color of law, in any circumstance described in subparagraph (B), willfully causes bodily injury to any person or, through the use of fire, a firearm, a dangerouse weapon, or an explosive or incendiary device, attempts to cause bodily injury to any person, because of the actual or perceived religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability of any person–
‘(i) shall be imprisoned not more than 10 years, fined in accordance with this title, or both; and
‘(ii) shall be imprisoned for any term of years or for life, fined in accordance with this title, or both, if–
‘(I) death results from the offense; or
‘(II) the offense includes kidnaping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill."
So all this bill does is prevent your taking the law into your own hands, where it doesn’t belong. Full text of HR1913 here,
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-1913
September 2nd, 2009 at 7:00 am
I think you need to read the law.
I do not think it means what you think it means
September 2nd, 2009 at 7:00 am
It’s opposed by many Catholics and Christians, from what I read.
Must mean it is a good bill that provides a minority protection from bigotry.
September 2nd, 2009 at 7:00 am
Mel here, Christian as well.
"Autogynephilia – the sexual arousal of a man by his own perception of himself as a woman or dressed as a woman" LMAO!
Frotteurism – Sounds like assault to me!
Incest – Should not be protected at all, ever, under any circumstances (unless they didn’t know it, but once they know they should have to stop)
Necrophilia – Gross!
Pedophilia – Should not be protected at all, ever, under any circumstances
Voyeurism – I am pretty sure there are laws against peeping toms already.
Zoophilia/Bestiality – This is disgusting.
The rest of them, I could care less about.
Edit: Also, did you intentionally leave heterosexuality in the list or forget to remove it? What you are saying is that none of the listed things deserve protection, so you are saying that straight people shouldn’t get protection either…From your point of view the things listed are "filth." I guess you are never having sex or thinking about haveing sex, ever. right?
September 2nd, 2009 at 7:00 am
I looked up the law and everything you are saying is a lie
September 2nd, 2009 at 7:00 am
They aren’t condoning it, in fact all the bill is meant to do is keep people from beating up pedophiles and such. It’s basically saying "Don’t take the law into your own hands, let the government punish the a55holes.") If you have a problem with not being able to beat up transvestites or homosexuals then by all means be mad.
TEH DEADLY KITTEH FYNDS YUR VIOLINT INCLUNAYSHUN TU BEE KWYTE UNSETLENG!