<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not a single Democrat congressman voted against this bill going before the Senate?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ejactulation.net/not-a-single-democrat-congressman-voted-against-this-bill-going-before-the-senate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ejactulation.net/not-a-single-democrat-congressman-voted-against-this-bill-going-before-the-senate/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 00:59:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joel V</title>
		<link>http://www.ejactulation.net/not-a-single-democrat-congressman-voted-against-this-bill-going-before-the-senate/comment-page-1/#comment-660</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 07:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ejactulation.net/not-a-single-democrat-congressman-voted-against-this-bill-going-before-the-senate/#comment-660</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s how the so-called &quot;sexual revolution&quot; works. You start with tolerating the smaller, less shocking sexual perversions, like homosexuality. After that, if you are ok with homosexuality, why shouldn&#039;t you be ok with anything else?  After all, if it feels good, it must be ok, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s how the so-called &quot;sexual revolution&quot; works. You start with tolerating the smaller, less shocking sexual perversions, like homosexuality. After that, if you are ok with homosexuality, why shouldn&#8217;t you be ok with anything else?  After all, if it feels good, it must be ok, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morganie4</title>
		<link>http://www.ejactulation.net/not-a-single-democrat-congressman-voted-against-this-bill-going-before-the-senate/comment-page-1/#comment-661</link>
		<dc:creator>Morganie4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 07:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ejactulation.net/not-a-single-democrat-congressman-voted-against-this-bill-going-before-the-senate/#comment-661</guid>
		<description>I for one am glad that the thought-crime legislation has finally passed!

My only concern is the added expense of all the mind-reading helmets we&#039;ll have to buy for all the judges and jurors across the country now :(  

We&#039;re supposed to be fiscally responsible!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I for one am glad that the thought-crime legislation has finally passed!</p>
<p>My only concern is the added expense of all the mind-reading helmets we&#8217;ll have to buy for all the judges and jurors across the country now <img src='http://www.ejactulation.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />   </p>
<p>We&#8217;re supposed to be fiscally responsible!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MST3K</title>
		<link>http://www.ejactulation.net/not-a-single-democrat-congressman-voted-against-this-bill-going-before-the-senate/comment-page-1/#comment-662</link>
		<dc:creator>MST3K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 07:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ejactulation.net/not-a-single-democrat-congressman-voted-against-this-bill-going-before-the-senate/#comment-662</guid>
		<description>uuuhhhh...da...da....da...ok i like uuuhhh 1...3....7.....10...(I&#039;ve done 14 overrated).....20..21....yeah</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uuuhhhh&#8230;da&#8230;da&#8230;.da&#8230;ok i like uuuhhh 1&#8230;3&#8230;.7&#8230;..10&#8230;(I&#8217;ve done 14 overrated)&#8230;..20..21&#8230;.yeah</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morey000</title>
		<link>http://www.ejactulation.net/not-a-single-democrat-congressman-voted-against-this-bill-going-before-the-senate/comment-page-1/#comment-663</link>
		<dc:creator>Morey000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 07:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ejactulation.net/not-a-single-democrat-congressman-voted-against-this-bill-going-before-the-senate/#comment-663</guid>
		<description>I would agree with the democrats on this one.

While you don&#039;t need to approve of homosexuality, it would be a hate crime if you killed someone because of their sexual orientation.  It would similarly be a hate crime if you killed the local sex offender because he (or she) were a pedophile.

It is not up to the public to be vigilantes.  that&#039;s what we have laws, courts and jails for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would agree with the democrats on this one.</p>
<p>While you don&#8217;t need to approve of homosexuality, it would be a hate crime if you killed someone because of their sexual orientation.  It would similarly be a hate crime if you killed the local sex offender because he (or she) were a pedophile.</p>
<p>It is not up to the public to be vigilantes.  that&#8217;s what we have laws, courts and jails for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lisamythical</title>
		<link>http://www.ejactulation.net/not-a-single-democrat-congressman-voted-against-this-bill-going-before-the-senate/comment-page-1/#comment-664</link>
		<dc:creator>lisamythical</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 07:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ejactulation.net/not-a-single-democrat-congressman-voted-against-this-bill-going-before-the-senate/#comment-664</guid>
		<description>Wrong Section, but i think you need some spiritual enlightenment...
have compassion and understanding, never greed to get what you want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wrong Section, but i think you need some spiritual enlightenment&#8230;<br />
have compassion and understanding, never greed to get what you want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It's so clear now!</title>
		<link>http://www.ejactulation.net/not-a-single-democrat-congressman-voted-against-this-bill-going-before-the-senate/comment-page-1/#comment-665</link>
		<dc:creator>It's so clear now!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 07:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ejactulation.net/not-a-single-democrat-congressman-voted-against-this-bill-going-before-the-senate/#comment-665</guid>
		<description>usually, democrat = sinner</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>usually, democrat = sinner</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patio  of  Fun</title>
		<link>http://www.ejactulation.net/not-a-single-democrat-congressman-voted-against-this-bill-going-before-the-senate/comment-page-1/#comment-666</link>
		<dc:creator>Patio  of  Fun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 07:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ejactulation.net/not-a-single-democrat-congressman-voted-against-this-bill-going-before-the-senate/#comment-666</guid>
		<description>I know it goes against your training to provide evidence for your claims, but could you supply a link to the actual text of this legislation? It&#039;s really important to your argument, really it is.

Edit: Okay, I did your work for you. Here is the substantive meat of the text of HR1913 as it stands currently,

&quot;‘(2) OFFENSES INVOLVING ACTUAL OR PERCEIVED RELIGION, NATIONAL ORIGIN, GENDER, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, GENDER IDENTITY, OR DISABILITY-

‘(A) IN GENERAL- Whoever, whether or not acting under color of law, in any circumstance described in subparagraph (B), willfully causes bodily injury to any person or, through the use of fire, a firearm, a dangerouse weapon, or an explosive or incendiary device, attempts to cause bodily injury to any person, because of the actual or perceived religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability of any person--

‘(i) shall be imprisoned not more than 10 years, fined in accordance with this title, or both; and

‘(ii) shall be imprisoned for any term of years or for life, fined in accordance with this title, or both, if--

‘(I) death results from the offense; or

‘(II) the offense includes kidnaping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill.&quot;

So all this bill does is prevent your taking the law into your own hands, where it doesn&#039;t belong. Full text of HR1913 here,

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-1913</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know it goes against your training to provide evidence for your claims, but could you supply a link to the actual text of this legislation? It&#8217;s really important to your argument, really it is.</p>
<p>Edit: Okay, I did your work for you. Here is the substantive meat of the text of HR1913 as it stands currently,</p>
<p>&quot;‘(2) OFFENSES INVOLVING ACTUAL OR PERCEIVED RELIGION, NATIONAL ORIGIN, GENDER, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, GENDER IDENTITY, OR DISABILITY-</p>
<p>‘(A) IN GENERAL- Whoever, whether or not acting under color of law, in any circumstance described in subparagraph (B), willfully causes bodily injury to any person or, through the use of fire, a firearm, a dangerouse weapon, or an explosive or incendiary device, attempts to cause bodily injury to any person, because of the actual or perceived religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability of any person&#8211;</p>
<p>‘(i) shall be imprisoned not more than 10 years, fined in accordance with this title, or both; and</p>
<p>‘(ii) shall be imprisoned for any term of years or for life, fined in accordance with this title, or both, if&#8211;</p>
<p>‘(I) death results from the offense; or</p>
<p>‘(II) the offense includes kidnaping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill.&quot;</p>
<p>So all this bill does is prevent your taking the law into your own hands, where it doesn&#8217;t belong. Full text of HR1913 here,</p>
<p><a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-1913" rel="nofollow">http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-1913</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malik L</title>
		<link>http://www.ejactulation.net/not-a-single-democrat-congressman-voted-against-this-bill-going-before-the-senate/comment-page-1/#comment-667</link>
		<dc:creator>Malik L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 07:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ejactulation.net/not-a-single-democrat-congressman-voted-against-this-bill-going-before-the-senate/#comment-667</guid>
		<description>I think you need to read the law.

I do not think it means what you think it means</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you need to read the law.</p>
<p>I do not think it means what you think it means</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cap'n T</title>
		<link>http://www.ejactulation.net/not-a-single-democrat-congressman-voted-against-this-bill-going-before-the-senate/comment-page-1/#comment-668</link>
		<dc:creator>Cap'n T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 07:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ejactulation.net/not-a-single-democrat-congressman-voted-against-this-bill-going-before-the-senate/#comment-668</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s opposed by many Catholics and Christians, from what I read.
Must mean it is a good bill that provides a minority protection from bigotry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s opposed by many Catholics and Christians, from what I read.<br />
Must mean it is a good bill that provides a minority protection from bigotry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mel</title>
		<link>http://www.ejactulation.net/not-a-single-democrat-congressman-voted-against-this-bill-going-before-the-senate/comment-page-1/#comment-669</link>
		<dc:creator>Mel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 07:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ejactulation.net/not-a-single-democrat-congressman-voted-against-this-bill-going-before-the-senate/#comment-669</guid>
		<description>Mel here, Christian as well.

&quot;Autogynephilia - the sexual arousal of a man by his own perception of himself as a woman or dressed as a woman&quot; LMAO! 

Frotteurism - Sounds like assault to me! 

Incest - Should not be protected at all, ever, under any circumstances (unless they didn&#039;t know it, but once they know they should have to stop)

Necrophilia - Gross! 

Pedophilia - Should not be protected at all, ever, under any circumstances 

Voyeurism - I am pretty sure there are laws against peeping toms already.

Zoophilia/Bestiality - This is disgusting.



The rest of them, I could care less about.


Edit: Also, did you intentionally leave heterosexuality in the list or forget to remove it? What you are saying is that none of the listed things deserve protection, so you are saying that straight people shouldn&#039;t get protection either...From your point of view the things listed are &quot;filth.&quot; I guess you are never having sex or thinking about haveing sex, ever. right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mel here, Christian as well.</p>
<p>&quot;Autogynephilia &#8211; the sexual arousal of a man by his own perception of himself as a woman or dressed as a woman&quot; LMAO! </p>
<p>Frotteurism &#8211; Sounds like assault to me! </p>
<p>Incest &#8211; Should not be protected at all, ever, under any circumstances (unless they didn&#8217;t know it, but once they know they should have to stop)</p>
<p>Necrophilia &#8211; Gross! </p>
<p>Pedophilia &#8211; Should not be protected at all, ever, under any circumstances </p>
<p>Voyeurism &#8211; I am pretty sure there are laws against peeping toms already.</p>
<p>Zoophilia/Bestiality &#8211; This is disgusting.</p>
<p>The rest of them, I could care less about.</p>
<p>Edit: Also, did you intentionally leave heterosexuality in the list or forget to remove it? What you are saying is that none of the listed things deserve protection, so you are saying that straight people shouldn&#8217;t get protection either&#8230;From your point of view the things listed are &quot;filth.&quot; I guess you are never having sex or thinking about haveing sex, ever. right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

